<p data-pm-slice="1 1 []">Mr Tretyakov argued that the following facts meant the property was not suitable for residential use:-</p>

<ul>
 	<li>·The ground floor had a separate energy performance certificate (EPC) for commercial use;</li>
 	<li>The ground floor was subject to a planning condition preventing residential use; and</li>
 	<li>The property had been sold by contract using the standard commercial conditions which meant it was not residential.</li>
</ul>